Unfair Contract Terms in a Consumer Setting

This blog post is written by Veronica Uddsten, lawyer at Synch

When drafting terms and conditions for a B2C-business, it is easy for businesses to primarily focus on the need of the business and fail to take into consideration the fairness of the provisions included from a consumer perspective. As unfair contract terms may become unenforceable, it is important to review the fairness of the provisions included before implementing such terms and conditions. In this blog post, we look closer at the rules related to fairness from a consumer perspective.

The Swedish Consumer Agency has stated that there are three main types of unfair contract terms in a B2C-situation. The first and most obvious type is when a provision does not comply with mandatory legislation. In this context it is worth noting that much of consumer protection legislation is mandatory and therefore may not be deviated from through an agreement between the business and the consumer.

The second type of unfair contractual terms is, unless it has been individually negotiated (i.e. not standard terms that constitute a “take it or leave it”-offer), when the provision is not in accordance with good faith, or non-mandatory consumer protection legislation, and creates a significant imbalance in the parties’ rights and obligations to the detriment of the consumer. Whether there is a significant imbalance depends on the nature of the goods or services sold, the other terms of the contract and the circumstances surrounding the conclusion of the contract.

The third type of unfair contract terms are provisions that are so misleading or vague that the consumer cannot foresee the consequences they may cause. On a side note, it is important to keep in mind that unclear provisions in standard terms will be interpreted to the benefit of the consumer.

Much guidance on what may constitute unfair provisions can be found in the so called “Grey List” of the EU directive 93/13/EEC referenced in the preparatory works of the Act on Contract Terms in Consumer Relations (SFS 1994:1512). The Grey List sets out several examples of what generally may be considered unfair contract terms but in rare cases, depending on the circumstances at hand, may not. Thus, the list is a “grey” list rather than a “black” list as it is not an absolute ban on the listed provisions. Some of the provisions that are set out in the Grey List are terms that:

  • give the seller a right to terminate the contract and keep money already paid for services that are not yet performed;
  • giving the seller a right to unilaterally change the contract terms without there being a justified ground that is listed in the terms at hand; and
  • requiring the consumer to comply with formal requirements for the consumer to be entitled to exercise its rights under the contract e.g. that termination requires written notice to a certain address.

In relation to unfair contract terms there may be both marketing law and civil law consequences, i.e. a ban on using the same or similar provisions in the future, non-compliance entailing a penalty, or the provision being deemed as unfair being adjusted to become more consumer friendly or being completely set aside and ignored, potentially leading to additional changes being made in the contract.

To ensure that a B2C-contract is enforceable and that it will hold up for the inspection of the Swedish Consumer Agency and the courts, it is important to keep consumer rules and regulations in mind when drafting the contract. For that reason, having a legal advisor that is experienced in consumer legislation is a great first step. If you run a B2C-business and need assistance in drafting or reviewing your terms and conditions, you are more than welcome to contact us at contact@synchlaw.se. This is our first post in our blog series on consumer protection. Make sure to check out our other posts in this series as well!

News and Insights
Blog Posts

Möjlighet till brygglån för start ups och andra företag

Yesterday

This blog post is written by Josefin Skyttedal, lawyer at Synch I samband med Regeringens senaste stödpaket fick Almi 3 miljarder i förstärkning till att stötta start up-bolag, små och medelstora bolag genom så kallade ”Brygglån”. Brygglånen riktar in sig på att stötta bärkraftiga företag i ovan nämnda kategorier av bolag i Sverige där finansieringsbehov […]

Press release

Synch – Intergiro

26/03/2020

Synch has delivered a contract management solution over its digital platform WeSynch to Intergiro Intl AB (publ), a Fintech which is redesigning corporate banking from zero. Intergiro offers a digital alternative to the hassle and stress of opening a bank account, built for the 2.5 million businesses born each year in Europe. Its mission is to […]

Press release

Synch has acted as legal advisor to Lingio AB

20/03/2020

Synch has acted as legal advisor to Lingio AB when the company raises capital in its first financing round amounting to SEK 17 million. Almi Invest acted as lead investor in the round where Add Value and Austrian venture fund Calm/Storm Ventures participated together with renowned angel investors. Lingio has been developed to tackle the […]

Blog Posts

Covid-19; kan force majeure tillämpas?

13/03/2020

This blog post is written by Anders Hellström and Josefin Skyttedal, lawyers at Synch Med anledning av den snabba spridningen av Coronaviruset, är det många som undrar över hur virusets spridning kan påverka deras affärsverksamhet. Särskilt kan detta gälla om effekterna av viruset medför eller utgör hinder mot att uppfylla avtal. Möjligheten att uppfylla åtaganden […]

Press release

Synch has acted as legal advisor to Mavenoid AB

06/03/2020

Synch has acted as legal advisor to Mavenoid AB in its recent A round investment of $8 million. New investor Mosaic Ventures together with existing investors Creandum and Point Nine Capital acted as lead investors. Shahan Lilja, Founder and CEO of Mavenoid comments on the transaction and assistance by Synch: ”Synch understands the nuances of […]

Press release

Mathilda Nordmark and Sara Sparring received excellent feedback in the World Trademark Review

25/02/2020

Congratulations to Sara Sparring, Mathilda Nordmark and the Trademark-team for the excellent feedback from trademark specialist on the market. The WTR 1000 is the only guide exclusively dedicated to identifying the world’s leading trademark legal services providers. In WTR 1000 2020 Synch is highlighted as: “If you’re looking for a modern and technology-focused firm, Synch […]